<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pittsburgh IP Law Blog &#187; PCT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pittsburghiplaw.com/category/pct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pittsburghiplaw.com</link>
	<description>Beck &#38; Thomas, P.C. - Patents, Copyrights &#38; Trademarks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='pittsburghiplaw.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://pittsburghiplaw.com/osd.xml" title="Pittsburgh IP Law Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://pittsburghiplaw.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Expiration of the 12 month priority period falls on a Saturday for a PCT Application</title>
		<link>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/08/21/expiration-of-the-12-month-priority-period-falls-on-a-saturday-for-a-pct-application/</link>
		<comments>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/08/21/expiration-of-the-12-month-priority-period-falls-on-a-saturday-for-a-pct-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beck &#38; Thomas, P.C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expiration of priority period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCT Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCT Application deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCT Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittsburghiplaw.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When filing a PCT application for a Pittsburgh Company the 12 month priority period fell on August 15, 2009 which is a Saturday.  The PCT application had already been filed on August 14, 2009 but the inventor wanted to add &#8230; <a href="http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/08/21/expiration-of-the-12-month-priority-period-falls-on-a-saturday-for-a-pct-application/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=pittsburghiplaw.com&#038;blog=8419245&#038;post=109&#038;subd=pittsburghiplaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When filing a PCT application for a Pittsburgh Company the 12 month priority period fell on August 15, 2009 which is a Saturday.  The PCT application had already been filed on August 14, 2009 but the inventor wanted to add some additional information and contacted us at 6:00 PM on August 15, 2009.  The additional matter would have required re-filing the application.  The inventor wanted to sleep on the decisions of re-filing to include the additional information.</p>
<p>This raised the issue of whether or not the priority period expired on August 15, 2009 or was extended to August 17, 2009 because August 15, 2009 was a Saturday.  PCT Rules 2.4 and 80.5 govern this situation and state as follows:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Rule 2.4 &#8211; &#8220;Priority Period&#8221;</span></p>
<p>(a) Whenever the term “priority period” is used in relation to a priority claim, it shall be construed as meaning the period of 12 months from the filing date of the earlier application whose priority is so claimed. The day of filing of the earlier application shall not be included in that period; and</p>
<p>(b) Rule 80.5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the priority period; and</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Rule 80.5 &#8211; “Expiration on a Non-Working Day or Official Holiday”</span></p>
<p>If the expiration of any period during which any document or fee must reach a national   Office or intergovernmental organization falls on a day:</p>
<p>  (i)  on which such Office or organization is not open to the public for the purposes of the transaction of official business;</p>
<p>the period shall expire on the next subsequent day on which none of the said four circumstances exists.</p>
<p>The U.S. Patent Office’s normal operation of business days are Monday through Friday. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>- John Thomas</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/109/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=pittsburghiplaw.com&#038;blog=8419245&#038;post=109&#038;subd=pittsburghiplaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/08/21/expiration-of-the-12-month-priority-period-falls-on-a-saturday-for-a-pct-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dd79b787385b5ccfe7eb9ae0fdc7eb45?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Beck &#38; Thomas, P.C.</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change to rule for Amending PCT claims</title>
		<link>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/07/03/change-to-rule-for-amending-pct-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/07/03/change-to-rule-for-amending-pct-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beck &#38; Thomas, P.C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh IP Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/change-to-rule-for-amending-pct-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Patent &#38; Trademark Office Rule for amending claims in a Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) Application changed effective July 1, 2009. 37 CFR 1.485 is the rule pertaining to amending PCT claims. The rule change is effective for &#8230; <a href="http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/07/03/change-to-rule-for-amending-pct-claims/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=pittsburghiplaw.com&#038;blog=8419245&#038;post=16&#038;subd=pittsburghiplaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States Patent &amp; Trademark Office Rule for amending claims in a Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) Application changed effective July 1, 2009. 37 CFR 1.485 is the rule pertaining to amending PCT claims. The rule change is effective for any amendments made to claims filed after July 1, 2009. Prior to July 1, 2009 Applicants were only required to submit replacement pages for the pages that contained changes. After July 1, 2009 Applicants are required to submit a complete set of claims with any amendment to the claims.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/pittsburghiplaw.wordpress.com/16/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=pittsburghiplaw.com&#038;blog=8419245&#038;post=16&#038;subd=pittsburghiplaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pittsburghiplaw.com/2009/07/03/change-to-rule-for-amending-pct-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dd79b787385b5ccfe7eb9ae0fdc7eb45?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Beck &#38; Thomas, P.C.</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
