Category Archives: Copyright

Trademark and Copyright Infringement Case Filed Against Pittsburgh Company

A California company and a Nevada limited liability company filed suit in the Western District Court against Pittsburgh company QuestMark LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising, copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and unfair competition.

The Amended Complaint filed February 11, 2010 alleges the following claims of trademark infringement under the Lanham Act:

1. Defendants’ use of the mark CREATING AN ACCOUNTABLE CULTURE constitutes infringement of Plaintiffs’ federally registered CREATING A CULTURE OF ACCOUNTABILITY;
2. Defendants’ use of the mark ACCOUNTABLE CULTURE constitutes infringement of Plaintiffs’ federally registered CULTURE OF ACCOUNTABILITY;
3. Defendants’ use of the mark KEYS TO ACCOUNTABILITY constitutes infringement of Plaintiffs’ federally registered STEPS TO ACCOUNTABILITY; and
4. Defendants’ use of the mark ACCOUNTABILITY WORKSHOP constitutes infringement of Plaintiffs’ federally registered ACCOUNTABILITY TRAINING.

The Amended Complaint also alleges copyright infringement of a customer proposal brochure and a document that lists training modules used by the California company in its leadership-training and management-consulting services. The document also outlines the key “take away” points from the various modules.

An Answer has not yet been filed.

Google Book Settlement Agreement Update

An Amended Settlement Agreement was preliminarily approved by the Honorable Denny Chin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 19, 2009.

The Supplemental Opt-out, Opt-in, and Objection and Objections to the Amended Settlement deadline is January 28, 2010.

A final settlement/fairness hearing is scheduled to be held on February 18, 2010. The purpose of the hearing will be to determine:

(a) whether the terms and conditions of the Amended Settlement Agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate;
(b) whether to certify the Amended Settlement Class and the Sub-Classes for purposes of the settlement; and
(c) whether the Amended Settlement Agreement should be approved by the Court and judgment entered thereon.

- Katie Cooper

Proposed $125 Million Google Settlement Agreement

bigstockphoto_Books_83906The goal of Google Book Search was to digitalize 15 million books by partnering with several large libraries including the New York Public Library and the University of California, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Stanford libraries.

The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. Google Inc., Case No. 05 CV 8136 (S.D.N.Y.) is a class action lawsuit brought by authors and publishers against Google Inc., claiming that Google violated their copyrights by scanning their books, creating an electronic database, and displaying short excerpts without the permission of the copyright holders. Google denied the claims.

The parties reached a proposed settlement agreement of $125 million that includes compensating authors and publishers whose books are still under copyright.

Under the agreement, Google will have a framework for the future in which Google will pay authors and publishers based on books sales and advertising revenue. According to Google the settlement agreement will, inter alia, help define how users access different categories of books:

1. In-copyright and in-print books

In-print books are books that publishers are still actively selling, the ones you see at most bookstores. This agreement expands the online marketplace for in-print books by letting authors and publishers turn on the “preview” and “purchase” models that make their titles more easily available through Book Search.

2. In-copyright but out-of-print books

Out-of-print books aren’t actively being published or sold, so the only way to procure one is to track it down in a library or used bookstore. When this agreement is approved, every out-of-print book that we digitize will become available online for preview and purchase, unless its author or publisher chooses to “turn off” that title. We believe it will be a tremendous boon to the publishing industry to enable authors and publishers to earn money from volumes they might have thought were gone forever from the marketplace.

3. Out-of-copyright books

This agreement doesn’t affect how we display out-of-copyright books; we will continue to allow Book Search users to read, download and print these titles, just as we do today.

http://books.google.com/googlebooks/agreement/

In response to the proposed settlement agreement, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York received over 400 submissions including objections to the proposed settlement, statements in support of the proposed settlement, and briefs from amici curiae, all of which were uploaded to the Court’s electronic filing system. Due to the large public interest in the case and the volume of submissions, the Court issued an Order on September 16, 2009 regarding procedures for the Fairness Hearing to be held on October 7, 2009. The Department of Justice has opened an antitrust investigation and may present its views by September 18, 2009.

- Katie Cooper

Copyright Registration for Computer Programs and Online Works for a Computer Program

A copyright registration for a computer program can extend to all copyrightable expression embodied in the computer program. Courts have varied opinions regarding whether screen displays may be registered separately. The Copyright Office indicates that a single registration is sufficient to protect the copyright in a computer program and related screen displays, without a separate registration for the screen displays. A specific claim in the screen displays may be asserted on the application. If you choose to specifically claim the screen displays, identifying materials for the screens must be deposited. (See United States Copyright Office Circular 61.)

For a claim for an online work for a computer program that establishes the format of text and graphics on the computer screen when a website is viewed (such as a program written in html), registration will extend to the entire copyrightable content of the computer program code. Registration will not extend to any website content generated by the program that is not present in the identifying material received and that is not described on the application. For all other computer programs that are transmitted or accessed online, the registration extends to the entire copyrightable content of the work even though the entire content is not required in the identifying material deposited. (See United States Copyright Office Circular 66.)

An application for copyright registration for a computer program and an application for an online work for a computer program can be submitted electronically. The deposit requirements for an application for a computer program are the same as the deposit requirements for an online work for a computer program. The deposit requirements vary depending on the individual issue and what is registrable.

Each person should consult United States Copyright Office Circulars 61 and 66 to determine which type of registration and deposit requirements work best for the protection you are seeking. For example, we had a case in which a computer program for an online work contained trade secret material. We were able to submit the application for registration and the deposit requirement electronically for an expedited copyright registration. We submitted the first and last 10 pages of source code with a cover sheet stating that the claim contained trade secrets.

Expedited Copyright Handling

Special handling is the expedited processing of an application for copyright registration
or for the recordation of a document pertaining to copyright. It is granted in certain circumstances to those who have compelling reasons, subject to the approval of the chief of the Receipt Analysis and Control Division.

Special handling is granted only in specific circumstances including:
• pending or prospective litigation,
• customs matters, or
• contract or publishing deadlines that necessitate the expedited issuance of a certificate.

Once a request for special handling is received and approved by the U.S. Copyright Office, every attempt is made to process the claim or recordation within five working days.

Special handling of a registration requires a special handling fee in addition to the registration fee. Likewise, special handling for recording a document requires a special handling fee in addition to the fee for recording the document. We were able to file an expedited application for copyright registration for an online work for a computer program electronically.

See United States Copyright Office Circular 10 – Special Handling.